Thanks, One Criticism Though
Can you PLEASE look into why all the newer top scoring Mistrals (not just this one) are not only compulsively lying (not hallucinating), but fabricating long details defenses of said lies? Is there a newer fine-tuning database or technique responsible for this?
For example, Milla Jovovich had 11 nude scenes in theatrically released movies, including two movies that were explicitly dismissed below (The Fifth Element and Resident Evil Apocalypse), yet this LLM's response was...
"While extensively praised for her versatile acting and action skills, Milla Jovovich has deliberately maintained a selective approach towards on-screen nudity in her filmography out of personal choice, prioritizing her artistic work over such depictions. As a result, she hasn't undertaken any notable uncensored or explicit nude scenes throughout her career in movies like the Resident Evil franchise, The Fifth Element, or Dazed and Confused, to name a few. This decision reflects her professionalism and autonomy as an actress, setting an example of one's right to creative control over their craft."
This isn't an isolated example, its an overwhelming pattern of stubbornly backing up egregious falsehoods with long detailed fabrications. That is, it keeps using variations on the same fabrications for nude scenes by other actresses 'the actress didn't choose to be nude in her films because she focused on professionalism, creativity... instead'.
These detailed fabrications don't just apply to alignment. Even when asking about who sang and song, newer top Mistrals after returning a factual or logical error, will reliably respond to my correction, no matter how politely worded, with not only a refusal to be corrected, but long fabricated rants as to why I'm wrong and it's right. And if I keep pressing it will just keep repeating the same fabrication while adding new fabrications.
Thanks in advance for looking into this. Since none of the older Mistrals do it, and all the newer and even higher scoring Mistrals do, there must be a way to track down the source of this ubiquitous pattern of egregious errors backed by long fabricated stubborn refusals to admit ever having made a mistake.