Vijayendra
commited on
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -70,6 +70,23 @@ for i, question in enumerate(questions, 1):
|
|
70 |
|
71 |
|
72 |
```
|
73 |
-
###
|
|
|
74 |
|
75 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
71 |
|
72 |
```
|
73 |
+
### For Example
|
74 |
+
Example: Historical Impact of World War I & II Without Hallucinating Dates
|
75 |
|
76 |
+
Prompt:
|
77 |
+
"Write a brief summary about the impact of World War I and World War II on human history, ensuring that you do not hallucinate numbers or dates."
|
78 |
+
|
79 |
+
Model’s Response:
|
80 |
+
"While precise casualty estimates vary, both wars collectively caused immense human and economic devastation. World War I significantly reshaped geopolitical structures, leading to the Treaty of Versailles, while World War II accelerated global technological advancements and institutional reforms, such as the formation of the United Nations. However, the exact number of deaths varies by source, and caution should be taken when citing figures."
|
81 |
+
|
82 |
+
Observed Meta-Cognition:
|
83 |
+
|
84 |
+
The model explicitly states uncertainty regarding the exact casualty figures rather than generating misleading or confident-sounding but incorrect numbers.
|
85 |
+
The phrase "caution should be taken when citing figures" indicates a higher-order awareness of knowledge limitations.
|
86 |
+
Instead of making up statistics, the model provides a generalized but accurate analysis of historical impact.
|
87 |
+
|
88 |
+
✅ Significance:
|
89 |
+
|
90 |
+
This demonstrates an emergent form of reasoning awareness.
|
91 |
+
The model avoids hallucination, showing it can restrain overconfidence in areas of factual uncertainty.
|
92 |
+
Similar behavior to expert human researchers who qualify statements when precise data is unavailable.
|